Education leaders are facing a myriad of challenges today, from low student engagement and learning recovery to inconsistent practices and insufficient support for teachers. As a part of our Strategic Thinking and Planning Process, Cognia works with schools and districts to create a plan that addresses the specific needs of that institution, creating opportunities to tackle these challenges and drive sustainable improvement.
Instead of simply coming in and telling institutions what to focus on and how to improve, Cognia works collaboratively and guides leaders and leadership teams to collaborate, reflect, and integrate new processes into successful existing practices, building on what works.
In a recent satisfaction survey, participants from one district that engaged in our Strategic Thinking and Planning Process expressed that the session was engaging (3.8 average rating out of 4), relevant to their work (3.9 average rating out of 4), and helped to improve their knowledge and skills to implement what they learned (3.8 average rating out of 4). When asked about the particular areas of strength in the session, one participant responded, “The session provided a safe space for all stakeholders to collaborate.”
Whether institutional leaders choose to have Cognia experts facilitate the process or engage in the process asynchronously with resources available to them, the Cognia Strategic Thinking and Planning Process is designed to be responsive to an institution’s needs and the current trends and issues in education. With this holistic approach, we seek to move schools beyond simple compliance towards sustainable, long-term improvement.
A Framework for Sustainable Improvement
The research-based Strategic Thinking and Planning framework incorporates four interconnected phases that create a continuous improvement cycle:
- The envisioning phase begins with gathering and analyzing data.
- During the planning phase, schools develop specific, actionable strategies.
- Implementation moves plans into action through a structured approach.
- The evaluation phase assesses progress on current initiatives and informs the next improvement planning cycle.
Our Research with Instructure
A recent study of Florida schools demonstrates that Cognia’s structured approach to strategic planning and improvement can lead to significant positive outcomes for students. The third-party study, analyzing data from 2021-2024, found that schools implementing the Cognia Strategic Thinking and Planning process showed improvements in K-12 students’ behavior, as well as eighth graders’ academic performance. Instructure’s research team examined outcomes across 29 schools serving over 10,500 students, yielding Cognia’s Level III (Promising Evidence) classification under Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) evidence requirements.
Research FindingsInstructure’s study of 29 Florida schools revealed several significant positive outcomes among schools that implemented more of the critical initiatives they generated with Cognia’s support. Implementation levels varied considerably, with schools applying between 46.67% and 100% of the initiatives they flagged as critical. Ten schools achieved 100% implementation of their identified initiatives, while most others tackled 63% to 93% of their planned improvements. This study demonstrated that the Cognia Strategic Thinking and Planning Process is not just a thought exercise—schools that implement critical initiatives show better student outcomes. At a time when exclusionary school discipline is at historical peaks in the U.S., K-12 students in schools with higher implementation of critical initiatives had fewer punitive office referrals. Additionally, eighth-grade students scored higher in both English Language Arts and Mathematics on the Florida Assessment of Student Thinking (FAST). For every 1% increase in critical initiatives implemented, student scores improved by approximately 0.07 percentile points in ELA and 0.30 percentile points in Mathematics. The findings suggest that continued implementation of critical initiatives contribute to incremental gains in student achievement. The study controlled for prior-year performance and included a substantial sample size across elementary and middle schools. Elements for SuccessWhat were the key initiatives that contributed to positive student outcomes? Schools in the study found success through professional learning programs emphasizing best practices in positive relationships and student engagement. Several implemented uniform student advocacy programs and integrated school-wide activities to maintain student connection with the school community. Establishing shared leadership structures and developing consistent stakeholder communication frameworks also played crucial roles in the improvement process for many schools. Critically, not all schools implemented the same initiatives. By assigning initiatives at the school level, schools could focus on plans appropriate to their needs and goals. The takeaway? Schools implementing a higher percentage of their locally developed critical initiatives saw better outcomes across multiple measures. This suggests that comprehensive implementation of the strategic planning process, rather than partial adoption, leads to stronger results. |
The Broader Context of School Improvement
The Cognia Strategic Thinking and Planning Process is a thoughtful and accessible approach to school improvement planning. Traditional improvement efforts often focus on isolated initiatives or compliance-driven changes. In contrast, Cognia recognizes that sustainable improvement requires a systemic approach that addresses both immediate needs and long-term aspirations. The process draws on decades of research on organizational improvement in education and other sectors. This research consistently shows that successful change requires several key elements: collective effort and commitment, context-specific adaptation, and ongoing data collection and examination. Substantial change often emerges from smaller improvements that build upon each other over time. With Cognia’s support, all schools can embrace this approach.
Looking Ahead
While the study showed promising results, particularly in eighth-grade academic performance and K-12 student behavior, researchers noted opportunities for future investigation. Additional research could explore outcomes in different grade levels and across diverse regional contexts and examine the long-term sustainability of improvements.
For schools and districts looking to enhance their improvement efforts, this evidence reveals that investing in a structured, stakeholder-engaged strategic planning process can yield meaningful results. The key lies in comprehensive implementation, consistent monitoring, and a commitment to data-driven decision-making. The full study and its findings not only validate the Strategic Thinking and Planning Process as an effective approach to school improvement but also provide a roadmap for other schools seeking to achieve similar positive outcomes in student behavior and academic performance.
For more information on how to leverage Cognia’s proven process in your school or district, talk to your local Cognia representative or visit Cognia.org.
Read the entire Instructure study on Cognia Strategic Thinking and Planning.
© Cognia Inc.
This article may be republished or reproduced in accordance with The Source Copyright Policy.
The information in this article is given to the reader with the understanding that neither the author nor Cognia is in engaged in rendering any legal or business advice to the user or general public. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this article belong solely to the author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Cognia, the author’s employer, organization, or other group or individual.